Sometimes it prints easily falsifiable studies, such as this, attacking the usefulness of ASCs. Other times it falsely promotes ESCs. That culminated in January when the journal had to retract two groundbreaking ESC studies that proved frauds.I have written over and over about ESC alternatives. The Embronic Stem Cell movement is a red herring. The press loves to frame the President as a narrow-minded rube, but the fact is, he is sparing tax payer dollars. He knows that the science with potential (adult stem cells, chord and placental stem cells) is being funded privately.
The journal wants to flood unpromising ESC research with taxpayer dollars because private investors know how unpromising it is. Yet again Science has showcased the scientific and moral bankruptcy of the entire ESC advocacy movement.
The ESC debate is political not scientific.
I am glad that W is suddenly fiscally conservative. Only took 5 1/2 years! I sure hope this is a trend.
ReplyDelete