If you're gay, it's okay to be hateful to gays, if the gay dares think differently than you think they should. It's the gay's fault he's stupid and must be punished. If you want to know what the heck I'm talking about, read more here.
This is yet another example of the forced two-party system and situational ethics.
The forced two party system currently attempts to force people to tow a certain "party line." If you vote Democrat, you must be pro-abortion, anti-gun, anti-war, etc. If you vote Republican, you must be pro-white, pro-war, anti-education... If you noticed, those are the extremes and also incorrect generalizations, and that is the point... Convincing people that you cannot be for Christ and vote Democrat, or you can't be for helping poor people and vote Republican. It's shite, plain and simple.
Now, on the situational ethics side... If it serves the Democrat purpose to "out" an individual that is not elected by the general public, that is ok because he is anti-gay... So that intrusion of privacy is ok while wire-tapping is not? What makes it even more sickening is that these same Democrats are supposed to be so "enlightened."
What a crock, the Dems prove everyday that they are every bit the a-moral douchebags that many on the right accuse them of being.
Where is the honor? I think honor left Washington a long time ago and neither party seems equipped to bring it back...
This is yet another example of the forced two-party system and situational ethics.
ReplyDeleteThe forced two party system currently attempts to force people to tow a certain "party line." If you vote Democrat, you must be pro-abortion, anti-gun, anti-war, etc. If you vote Republican, you must be pro-white, pro-war, anti-education... If you noticed, those are the extremes and also incorrect generalizations, and that is the point... Convincing people that you cannot be for Christ and vote Democrat, or you can't be for helping poor people and vote Republican. It's shite, plain and simple.
Now, on the situational ethics side... If it serves the Democrat purpose to "out" an individual that is not elected by the general public, that is ok because he is anti-gay... So that intrusion of privacy is ok while wire-tapping is not? What makes it even more sickening is that these same Democrats are supposed to be so "enlightened."
What a crock, the Dems prove everyday that they are every bit the a-moral douchebags that many on the right accuse them of being.
Where is the honor? I think honor left Washington a long time ago and neither party seems equipped to bring it back...