Thursday, February 08, 2007

Stalkers & Crazy Astronauts--UPDATED Stalker Attacks Elie Wiesel

UPDATE: Another lunatic stalks and attacks author and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize.

In a posting Tuesday on the anti-Zionist Web site ZioPedia, a writer using the name Eric Hunt takes credit for the attack: “After ensuring no women would be traumatized by what I had to do (I had been trailing Wiesel for weeks), I stopped the elevator at the sixth floor. I pulled Wiesel out of the elevator. I said I wanted to interview him.”
They are always so benign--the stalkers intentions. Crazy Astronaut Nowak wanted to "talk" with rope, gloves, pepper spray and a gun. This guy wanted to talk by dragging a holocaust survivor into a hotel room and "interview" him about a genocide that "never happened".


This woman astronaut case has hit a nerve and I don't think it's because she's a NASA employee, but because she's a Rocket Scientist as crazy as average people. Smart people don't usually act crazy or do crazy things, or do they? They understand the risks. They are smart enough to know that their imagined relationship is imagined. They know that harming someone won't get them what they want. They know these things, because they're smart.

This lady astronaut kinda blows that theory, doesn't it? Actually, lots of smart people stalk according to this article by Wendy Koch of the USA Today:
In celebrity cases, she says, stalkers often have psychiatric disorders. The more typical stalker, however, is someone who has trouble letting go of a real or imagined relationship but whose emotional condition may be less severe than a mental illness.

"The problem with stalking-related behavior is it's a slippery slope," she says. "It's normal not to want to let someone go," but it can become a problem when a rejected person persists, she says.

"It's often about power and control," Leary says. She says it can become dangerous, leading to sexual assault and murder, especially when a stalker takes the attitude that "if I can't have you, no one will."

The most recent comprehensive research on stalking, a 1998 Justice Department study, found that more than 1 million women and about 370,000 men are stalked annually in the USA. Women account for 78% of the victims and men for 87% of the perpetrators. The study said one in every 12 women will be stalked during her lifetime, and 81% of women stalked by a current or former intimate partner were physically attacked.

A survey of nearly 10,000 adults published in 2006 found 4.5% reported having been stalked. It was done by Kathleen Basile, a scientist at the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

An astronaut himself gives insight into a the fine line between achievement and aggression:

Former astronaut Jerry Linenger said astronauts take pride in their self-discipline, “and you set a goal and it's just going, going, going and you let nothing get in your way.

That single-minded pursuit reminds Linenger of Nowak's drive from Houston to Orlando, Fla., to confront an Air Force captain from Florida who she allegedly believed was involved with the same space shuttle pilot she loved.

However, Linenger said, that's when Nowak's training should have kicked in and led her to reflect on her actions: “To not make a midcourse correction is scary. It's just off her training and everything else.”

Dr. Pat Santy, a former NASA psychiatrist who evaluated the astronaut's mental fitness, believes that "acquired narcissism" causes the problems. For run-of-the-mill stalkers, I think they may have had narcissistic tendencies for a long time, that only come out the first time they perceive rejection (real or imagined). Dr. Santy says:
Like any other two-bit narcissistic personality disorder, they have come to believe that they are at the center of everyone's world.
I would add this: When people come from a deficit (nerd in high school, abused by parents, abandoned in childhood) and then achieve belonging, even in artificial ways, when rejection or expulsion from the group or some other real or perceived loss occurs that either consciously or subconsciously triggers deep-seated fears in a person, they will go to almost any length to maintain control of the situation so as not to feel the loss again.

Stalkers are outsiders looking in and hate the shame, loneliness and smallness they feel. Every weird step they take to ensure the connection to their prey, further alienates them, but they are so driven by their own unmet needs they press on anyway, further alienating the object/s of their desire. What they feel for the other person isn't love or affection but their own need for security and a projected ideal of togetherness. If only...

When the suffocated and progressively alarmed person on the receiving end pushes further away, the situation escalates. If the object of the stalker acquiesces to try to "sort things out", or "get closure", the stalker will believe a fantasy of togetherness again and ratchet up the attempts at control. The stalkee doesn't realize that by indulging the stalker, the stalker's bad behavior was reinforced. The stalker is not rational. Trying to deal with this person in a rational way won't work.

Pierre Legrand describes his family's personal experience with a stalker. His solution was a loaded gun. If the statistics on stalking are correct, he made the exact right decision.

Wendy McElroy also dealt with a stalker and has some good advice.

And here is the best psychological descriptions of stalkers I've seen.

People who harass and stalk are not the victims they view themselves to be. They are narcissists, obsessional, and selfish. They are jealous, angry and controlling. They often refuse to stop. They are irrational. And as this lady astronaut shows, they can be very, very dangerous.

A lot of talk bubbles around about NASA examining their psychological profiling. To me, what makes a good test pilot (risk-taking, smart, quick, won't take no for an answer, brash, driven, seeks challenges, loves novelty) can make for a crazy person when misapplied. I submit that they can test these people to high heaven and might not find the one thing that flips someone's lid.

There is no question, though, that a lid is flipped. Once that happens, these people are very dangerous, indeed.


Anonymous said...

Smart people don't usually act crazy or do crazy things, or do they?

I have an IQ in the 160 range.
I KNOW I'm not wrapped all that tight. I never have been. (Something about my mind thrashing on multiple channels at high speed, never slowing down or letting up, not even when I sleep.)

I have also observed intellectual snobs who thought their IQ made them a one-person Master Race, a Nietschean Superman not bound by any bourgeois morality. In their mind, their High IQ made them Perfect In Every Way.

As an ex-kid genius, I can attest that the fantasy of the Genius (TM) is Wesley Crusher or Jimmy Neutron. The reality is more like Dallas Egbert III.

Dr. Melissa said...

A person with a 160 I.Q. who is not wrapped tightly enough, 'eh? Don't do drugs, they'll unhinge you further.

Stay sober. Go to church. Take a yoga class.

I remember a smarty-pants kid in the GT classes I took. He was skipped up a grade, had very intellectual parents, only child, snorted cocaine, ahead of his time, really. One day in Honors History (the professor used the University of Michigan reading list and curriculum) and we were talking about Aristophanes or something. Another person brought up a biblical passage and this little intellectual immediately took an attitude. Of course he was an atheist! I mean really! Atheists are so much smarter.

The teacher said, "You know, Chris, in the Western world, one can hardly consider himself educated if he doesn't know the most important piece of literature in Western civilization."

That shut him up. For a minute.

Intelligence gets one so far. A spirit-rich life can make the simple wise. Too often, the smart people are "of two minds" and unstable.

Anonymous said...

Doc, I DO stay sober, and attend Mass regularly.

As for yoga, I've found "recreational thinking" Gedankenexperiments and reading lots of SF & Fantasy does the same job for me.

(Though I still wish someone like me -- survivor of being a kid genius -- had gotten to Dal Egbert before the drug & gay scene did...)

Dr. Melissa said...

Oooo, I love Fantasy and Sci Fi. Any good recommendations? I'm between series and need to start a new one. Shhhh, don't tell the hubby. He knows that once I start, I go on a marathon and read everything from the author.

As a person to the left of you on the Bell Curve, my mind shuts off completely (well, not completely, but I sleep soundly) when I sleep. It's the childrens I tell you! They suck brain cells and induce sleep deprivation. Suddenly: I.Q. 95!

Anonymous said...

Well, my old Dungeonmaster (D&D, *not* BDSM) used to say "I have an IQ somewhere around 150, but I'm so lazy I only use about 90 of it."

Oooo, I love Fantasy and Sci Fi. Any good recommendations?

Well, there's Eric Flint's "1632" series (1632, 1633, two novels whose titles begin with 1634, and two short collections called The Grantville Gazette) -- probably the best of the "Forward into the Past" time-travel sub-genre. And Tim Powers Declare. I normally avoid anything by S.M.Stirling, but his Peshawar Lancers is about the only Stirling novel I like.

However, all these are long and thick enough (about the thickness of War and Peace) to be used as murder weapons.

In fantasy, I've always been partial to Katherine Kurtz's Deryni Chronicles series; I recommend the earlier Kelson sub-series (Deryni Rising, Deryni Checkmate, and High Deryni) as they're shorter; you can go through a volume at a single sitting. There's also the little-known small-pressA Whisper of Wings and Fangs of Kaath by Paul Kidd.

Rare graphic novel, if you can find it: Here Comes a Candle by Mary-Hanson Roberts. Drawn & lettered in faux 18th Century style, it retells the story of the French Revolution using animal characters, descendents of Puss in Boots and others from French fairy tales. Real groaners of puns & in-jokes -- both visual and in dialog -- on every page. As far as I know, only available from its small-press publisher, Shanda Fantasy Arts.

Plug: Check out Infinite Space, Infinite God, an anthology of Catholic-themed SF coming out from Twilight Times Books later this year. I'm plugging it because I co-wrote the longest piece in the book (first pro publication) and would like to give it some buzz.

Dr. Melissa said...

Hey thanks!

Now if I could only make more money with this blogging thing, I could justify a self-indulgent $200 book purchase!

Lugh said...

Semite- The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern people originating in southwestern Asia, including Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, Arabs, and Ethiopian Semites.

Caucasian- A term describing white people who originated from Caucasia.

Caucasia- The Caucasus, also referred to as Caucasia, is a geopolitical, mountain-barrier region located between the two continents of Europe and Asia, or Eurasia, with various altitude highlands and lowlands.

Any attack on a caucasian is an anti-semitic act.

Israel's attack on Palestinians is an anti-semitic act.

Zionism and Freemasonry are Anti-semitic organizations.

Adi said...

Oes Tsetnoc one of the ways in which we can learn seo besides Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa. By participating in the Oes Tsetnoc or Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa we can improve our seo skills. To find more information about Oest Tsetnoc please visit my Oes Tsetnoc pages. And to find more information about Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa please visit my Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa pages. Thank you So much.
Oes Tsetnoc | Semangat Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa